Non-conformance report
A non-conformance report (NCR sometimes referred to as a non-conformity report) is a formal document used to identify, record, and address instances where work, materials, or processes do not meet the specified requirements or standards. It serves as a crucial tool for maintaining quality control and ensuring that construction projects comply with contractual, regulatory, and industry standards.
The primary purpose of an NCR is to document any deviation from the agreed standards, specifications, or contractual requirements. It ensures that non-conforming work is identified, assessed, and corrected to prevent recurrence and to maintain the overall quality of the project.
For example, NCRs might be required:
- When materials delivered to the site do not meet the required specifications or are damaged.
- If the work carried out does not meet the quality standards set out in the project specifications.
- If there are deviations from approved construction methods or procedures.
- Breaches of health and safety regulations or practices.
An NCR might include:
- A detailed explanation of the issue, including what was found to be non-compliant.
- The standards, specifications, or drawings that the work should have conformed to.
- Information about where and when the non-conformance was identified.
- The party responsible for the non-conformance.
- Suggested actions to correct the non-conformance.
- Review and approval by relevant parties, such as the project manager, quality control officer, or site engineer.
The NCR is reviewed by the appropriate authority to determine the severity and impact, and actions are proposed and implemented to rectify the non-conformance. The corrective actions are then reviewed to ensure they have been effective in resolving the issue, and the NCR is then formally closed.
NCRs are vital for maintaining high standards of quality on construction projects. They help to manage and mitigate risks associated with non-compliance and provide a record of issues that can be analysed to improve processes and prevent future non-conformances. They ensure that there is a clear record of issues and corrective actions, promoting accountability within the project team and, helping ensure the successful and compliant delivery of construction projects.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
- Backlog.
- Burn down chart.
- Commissioning.
- De minimis.
- Defects.
- Defects liability period.
- Defects list.
- Defective Premises - Liability and Measure of Damages.
- Defective Premises Act.
- Final certificate.
- Practical completion.
- Punch list.
- Schedule of defects.
- Site inspection.
- Snagging.
- Work-to-complete list.
Featured articles and news
The act of preservation may sometimes be futile.
Twas the site before Christmas...
A rhyme for the industry and a thankyou to our supporters.
Plumbing and heating systems in schools
New apprentice pay rates coming into effect in the new year
Addressing the impact of recent national minimum wage changes.
EBSSA support for the new industry competence structure
The Engineering and Building Services Skills Authority, in working group 2.
Notes from BSRIA Sustainable Futures briefing
From carbon down to the all important customer: Redefining Retrofit for Net Zero Living.
Principal Designer: A New Opportunity for Architects
ACA launches a Principal Designer Register for architects.
A new government plan for housing and nature recovery
Exploring a new housing and infrastructure nature recovery framework.
Leveraging technology to enhance prospects for students
A case study on the significance of the Autodesk Revit certification.
Fundamental Review of Building Regulations Guidance
Announced during commons debate on the Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report.
CIAT responds to the updated National Planning Policy Framework
With key changes in the revised NPPF outlined.
Councils and communities highlighted for delivery of common-sense housing in planning overhaul
As government follows up with mandatory housing targets.